* The intellectual property rights of each work are owned by each student.
(Human Assisting Video Assistant Referee)
YOUNGJAE YUN
As a result, people started looking to technology for fairness. For strict offside and penalty kick decisions, football added Video Assistant Referees (VARs), and Taekwondo started using electronic hoops to replace the referee’s subjective assessment. Baseball has even embraced the ABS(Automated Ball Strike) system, which uses robots with artificial intelligence to call strikes.
Do people actually want or need artificial intelligence (AI) to make sports more fair? This topic is worthy of discussion. This is done so that, even if an AI referee has a 98% accuracy rate, humans won’t have to deal with the 2% of biased decisions. And even if AI uses objective standards to decide, it is still up to people to determine that the results are fair. Can we rely on AI to for creating a fair world? This issue might even spark a debate about whether AI judges’ judgments are always correct.
Consider the future now! The 2034 World Cup’s final match will be contested between South Korea and France. With AR, people won’t need to visit a stadium to enjoy the benefits of intuition. Maybe people will move from their seats to make room for the cameras that the numerous VARs on the field use to make sure the officials are being fair. Korea scored the game-winning goal. But the goal was ruled offside by the AI referee. The decision nevertheless seems controversial to the human eye. In the end, the South Korean coach ultimately requests that the HAVAR (Human Assisting Video Assistant Referee) system reread the AI’s judgment. You have to consider the fairness of this choice: was the AI still 98% fair at this critical moment? People rely on AI to make fair decisions, but humans must also judge AI for it to be fair. Is the fair society and sports we seek really one where AI makes the decisions?
2023